Latest Perspective

President pinned below 40 percent approval, deep bond market anxiety, sovereigntist surges, and a (possible) rabbit in the hat.

Less than 30 days out from pivotal U.S. midterm elections, a potentially devastating mix of domestic pocketbook pressures and geopolitical alarm is forcing an administration and a President pinned below 40 percent approval into an aggressive, unpredictable campaign posture that seemingly leaves little room for compromise on trade.

The underlying numbers tell the story. While headline GDP growth remains modest, the 10-year Treasury yield is pushing toward 5.3% ,its highest level since 2002, signaling deep bond market anxiety over swelling fiscal deficits, heavy AI-infrastructure borrowing, and geopolitical risk.

With unemployment figures ticking up, a dismal 29,000 jobs added in September, and high gas prices driven by escalating Middle East tensions with Iran, consumers are feeling the hit in their wallets. Struggling to meet basic living costs, voters are unlikely to view international trade deals as a remedy for inflation, forcing Washington’s trade team to operate under a tightly constrained domestic mandate.

Against this backdrop, the bilateral paths of the two USMCA partners are diverging sharply in tone and substance.

In Mexico City, official body language suggests genuine movement toward an interim arrangement. Mexican negotiators are signaling quiet confidence that a deal could be reached to lower U.S. tariffs on light vehicles from 25% down to 15%, alongside relief on Section 232 steel and aluminum duties, before political windows snap shut. Detroit is watching closely; as Ford Motor CEO Jim Farley put it, getting this near-term tariff deal across the finish line "will be a great bridge to USMCA."

Yet below these tactical wins, market observers remain wary. Juan Pablo Spinetto’s recent Bloomberg analysis highlighted that despite record export numbers, manufacturing employment in Mexico fell by 2.6% in August, partly because high-growth sectors like AI hardware rely heavily on imported content, generating far less domestic value-added than traditional auto manufacturing. Beyond these structural limits, boardroom discussions remain concerned with public security, rule of law, and money-laundering headlines.

As the Trump administration sees it, tariff relief will always remain conditional on security compliance, a point underscored this week as President Claudia Sheinbaum was forced to adroitly manage U.S. allegations of gunfire originating from the Mexican side targeting U.S. border personnel, maintaining that Mexican security forces had detected no such incident.

In Ottawa, Prime Minister Mark Carney continues his diplomatic push across Europe, pitching Canada as a "middle power" anchor and floating closer ties with Brussels. While European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen opened the door to an "Alliance for the Future" that could make Canada the EU's first "associate member," the proposal sparked domestic debate over whether Ottawa was overreaching, given that CETA remains unratified in several EU member states. More critically, Carney must now navigate rising brush fires at home: Monday night’s provincial election in Quebec saw Paul St-Pierre Plamondon lead the separatist Parti Québécois back to power, while voters in Alberta prepare to vote in just two weeks on triggering a binding separation referendum. While St-Pierre Plamondon expressed a willingness to collaborate with the federal government, managing these dual sovereigntist surges will demand an increasing share of Ottawa’s executive bandwidth.

Still, beneath the European diplomacy and domestic political friction, the quiet bilateral track between Ottawa and Washington continues to move steadily forward. Free of the acute security friction that plagues the southern border, U.S.-Canada working groups on energy corridors, defense procurement, and critical supply chains are making real progress. Canadian officials know where their core economic engine sits: as one senior diplomat put it off the record last week, "Our European ambitions are an additive strategy—North American integration remains our core engine."

As the USMCA review cycle approaches, the essential architecture of North American trade remains irreplaceable. For both Mexico and Canada, maintaining tariff-free access to the U.S. market is not merely a policy goal; it is the cornerstone of their economic stability. Despite the political friction along both borders, the underlying mechanics of cross-border supply chains mean that a functional, updated USMCA is the single most practical and economically sound outcome for all three nations, even if achieving it requires navigating a treacherous political minefield.

The open question is whether, amidst the campaign circus and high-wire diplomacy, a pragmatic continental trade deal is the rabbit the Trump administration might pull out of its hat. Mark Carney needs a major international win to anchor national unity against domestic fracturing, and Mexico City has patiently positioned itself to capture immediate tariff relief. While a comprehensive breakthrough seems unlikely in the heat of an election season, the sheer force of economic necessity and potential political upside might just create enough space for a surprise before the current political window closes.

Know a colleague navigating USMCA uncertainty or interested in North America? Please feel free to forward this briefing to them.

Sincerely, 

Antonio Garza

The views expressed here are solely my personal opinions and do not constitute legal advice from, or on behalf of, the firm.

Was this forwarded to you? Join nearly 3000+ executives who receive my View on North America. Subscribe here: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/the-view-from-north-america-7458578796343054336